Islam , especially the fundamentalistic version objects to a lot of things that are a part of the modern world we live in. They can object all they like and then piss off back to the desert tribal life style their religion came from.
I understand, but Islamic Objections are are reasonable objections to the conception of the Trinity. It doesn’t matter whether they happen to be from another religion. If you’re analyzing the conceptual framework of a set of ideas, Christianity, then alternative piints of view are a reasonable source.
Read the article but, why does it even matter what scholars of delusion say about another group of the deluded use to define their delusion?
Whether you divide a god into 3 parts or a hundred parts you are still deluding yourself that there even id s god.
That’s very true, but when you’re arguing against a position it’s best to understand the opposite position.