"The results suggest that confirmation bias is not just a question of people rejecting facts as false — it can involve people rejecting facts as something that could be proven or disproven at all."
While this result focused on rep vs. dem, I daresay it may also be relevant to our site and apply to religious vs. non-religious appreciation of facts vs. opinions.
The information age has created a mindset where people have several problems processing information correctly.
This isn't a problem with politics or theism or any other specific opposing viewpoints. The abundance of information and social communication channels is coalescing in propaganda spreading like wildfire and a highly polarized populace.
People vote against their personal interests because they are buying into dishonest commentary not only by their leaders but by their friends and that tribal mentality has a huge impact. Imagine a view point with your friends where all of them are pro-life and you're pro-choice. Do you feel comfortable having that discussion with them or do you feel separated from them due to it?
In my opinion the ability for adults to process information and weed out what is true and what is not is the largest hurdle that humanity has ever faced. I hope I'm blowing it out of proportion but I don't think I am.
That is why it would be nice to have a place to go that we could trust to verify these statements. Wouldn't that be great?
@TheMiddleWay Thanks
@TheMiddleWay Problem that I have been running into more often lately are the fools that tell me something to the effect that Snopes is a leftist propaganda site and can't be trusted. Beligerence is far too easy of a position to take for too many people.