Hmm.. I see a lot of anti pollution movements still, nature saving movements, technologies to purify water... to suck water out of the air even... storm prompting technologies. That all seems pretty pro active to me. I'd say find one and get involved.
I have viewed these and only the one for purifying ocean water is logical for supporting a large population. The water from air would require a very large system and may work in the desert but again it would take many units to serve a population.The storm promting hasn't been effective. It is more practical and cost effective to store and move water that is already available.
@Marine I think all of them could be of some use if worked together. I think any one alone could be taking on too much of a strain to effective on it's own. I'm not saying they should all get equal time and space but it does seem making one a main priority with the others as support would be more prudent. I do also think green movements would be far more helpful. So would education at all levels about supporting nature to keep things cleaner and greener would be of great help. But it really has to be everyone. Good luck convincing the whole without education from the ground up.
Because Americans are reactive. If we were proactive, out TV news would be a LOT different.
The First Nations throughout United States are having demonstrations about protecting a water they did some pretty bad things to the First Nations is standing Rock a year or two ago lot of them were arrested under false pretenses water was sprayed in their faces and freezing temperatures rubber bullets were shot at them canisters for shot at them also one lady might have lost her eye another lady almost lost her arm you don't hear that on the news it wasn't that bad when I was there
Probably because the water companies don't want to eat away at their profits. It costs to invest in water protection schemes.
because people don't think of it till its full on. Others say its your problem not theirs so don't care. Some expect the government to fix it and not cost them anything
It is a known fact that we will be facing a water shortage in the coming future. I question why we are not building new reservoirs to catch winter flood waters for future use? This would seem to be a reasonable approach to securing future water needs. Speaking of winter floods why is the government allowing the same people to rebuild homes in areas that continue to wipe them out. This money used to rebuild these homes could be used to build the reservoirs.