We all know the types, that believe God intervenes when something wonderful happens, some kind of divine plan, but deny that anything terrible is of God's doing. What is your take on this?
I see it as you can't have it both ways. If you believe that God is all powerful then that being does everything or nothing.
Anyone spewing out the gawd gott gods sounds to me get an instant reply: "What are you talking about? They merely repeat the sound gawd. I repeat WHAT IS THAT? THEY HAVE no coherent answer only gibberish. ...I never enable delusions. ....Some get wise then fall back SO YOU'RE an Atheist ? I stare. "You don't believe in gawd? My reply is I WALK IN DOORS I have no need for door beliefs because doors exist. ....after that they know they have been branded stupid
The miracle vs the "tragical." You can't have one without the other.
Edward Currant (religious Poe type satire on youtube) came up with the term in one of his videos some time back.
If God is omniscient and omnipotent, I don't see how he could "intervene" at any time. If he knows everything that's going to happen and controls everything, then everything must have been set up exactly the way he wanted it to at creation. He couldn't not know something or change his mind, and no situation could arise that's not part of his plan. That's why I never understood praying for something to happen. I'd be like, "why? He's already decided everything, duh.". And don't even get me started on "Satan", who is also supposedly a creation of this all knowing, all powerful God. If Gods own creation could undermine him in any way, he'd be a lousy object of worship.
You have to be pretty shallow in your thinking to accept this stuff. It took me a short time as a child to sort it out.
Selective good deeds and selective tragedies.