Should children be placed back in homes where they were once abused?
"For the first two years of his life, Mikey lived with Ms. Buck, who was actively manufacturing and using methamphetamine. The Pediatric Resource Center for Child Abuse and Neglect (PRC) in Peoria, Illinois examined Mikey and documented multiple injuries he incurred while under the care of his mother, including: severe bruising, blunt force trauma, a human bite mark, black eyes, anal bleeding and tear, forehead bruising, rope burns, burned fingers, sores, misplaced hips, and excessive dental problems."
The mother could be clean and no longer abusive now. She might not. It seems he was better off with the woman who he first hugs.
1:46 "She used to hurt me." :'(
0
Enjoy being online again!
Welcome to the community of good people who base their values on evidence and appreciate civil discourse - the social network you will enjoy.Create your free account
7 comments
Feel free to reply to any comment by clicking the "Reply" button.
I think Christians should be allowed to indoctrinate their own children if they want.
AceV
Level 2
Oct 13, 2018
0
What does this have to do with the question?
No! Drugs may have escalated the abuse, but once an abuser always an abuser. At the very least, short supervised visit and go from there. Absolutely heartbreaking that innocent children have to endure the failures of government.
Green_eyes
Level 8
Oct 13, 2018
2
Enjoy being online again!
Welcome to the community of good people who base their values on evidence and appreciate civil discourse - the social network you will enjoy.Create your free account
Share this post
Categories
Agnostic does not evaluate or guarantee the accuracy of any content. Read full disclaimer.