"Creationist Nonsense" is redundant.

I am fully convinced that evolution is a true theory, however, like all theories, Darwinism does not tell the whole story IMO.

I saw nothing about epigenetics in the article. New developments cast doubt on Darwin’s theory in regards to natural selection. Many researchers are saying that evolution is not driven solely by natural selection, and that natural selection might play only a secondary role.

Epigenetics does not invalidate the theory of evolution—what it does is open the door to the possibility that evolution could be guided by consciousness rather than by blind random chance.

It must be admitted that it is possible to guide evolution through conscious choices—breeders do it all the time. There are some mysteries involved here.

I do not advocate the teaching of creationism in science classrooms, but I do advocate the teaching of truth about what is known and not known. BTW, I am proud to be cousin to monkeys.

i see a lot of "science" articles presented on agnostic dot com (and facebook to a lesser extent) and they're usually badly written (and apparently unproofread, let alone edited), don't even match their titles in what they're about, and leave the reader either convinced of falsehoods or half-truths because the reader has not recognized inconsistencies (usually assumptions based on facts not in evidence) or frustrated because the reader has indeed either recognized them or intuited them.

this article is not one of those. this article is WONDERFUL. it's from a reputable source, it is exactly what its title says it will be, it has been meticulously thought out and well written, and it's fascinating! i love it! it gets technical as necessary without being inaccessible, and it really does go after all the arguments you hear from sophisticated (read "dishonest" as opposed to "delusional" ) creationists. (i have to admit i hear the monkey argument a lot, and the macro/micro thing a lot lately too, and have found it easy to counter for former but not so easy, since i'm not a scientist, to counter the latter. now i have a reference! i almost said a quick reference but this is beautifully explicit and detailed. i highly recommend that EVERYONE read this, whether or not you've been annoyed by self-admitted creationists or those tricky intelligent-design-promoting creationists (oh and by the way, if you see ben stein, please tell him to go to hell! oh wait, there is no hell. well, we'll think of something!)

g