Agreed.

AMGT, you seem to be using agnostic as a term meaning "lack of knowledge?" These three terms, agnostic, theist, and atheist, all address the existence of a god or gods.

You are very much mistaken bingst when you say:

"AMGT, you seem to be using agnostic as a term meaning "lack of knowledge?" These three terms, agnostic, theist, and atheist, all address the existence of a god or gods"

No they don't & any decent dictionary will tell you the nuanced differences:

Agnostic: a person who does not know if there is a god or gods.
Atheist: a person who does not believe god claims.
Theist: a person who believes in a supernatural creator being

If someone is asked if they believe there's a god & they can't say they do is an unbeliever & therefore must be an atheist otherwise they would say 'Yes' or maybe 'Probably'. 'Perhaps' isn't saying 'yes'.

While it may be true that atheists have no way to be 100% certain no god exist & I can't but I also cannot be 100% certain there are no mermaids under the sea somewhere so should I also be agnostic about those sort of claims too? If not what's the BIG difference seeing as there's no good reason to believe such mermaid claims or any god claim you care to mention - or is there 1 good reason?

Could you rephrase that question for me, please?
I have a messed up brain and I take a lot of meds so I get confused rather easily sometimes.

Sure Paul628. The question pose was:

"Does this seem like an agnostic or atheist site?
Does this seem like an agnostic or atheist site?"

This can be rephrased as:

Does this seem like a site for people who don't know if there's a god or a site who don't believe god claims?

either way people don't believe that there IS a god yeah?

Thanks for clearing that up for me Paul, I get scrambled sometimes.

I believe there is one type of agnostic who believes there is a god but can't be sure.

Then there is the type who does not believe there is a god but can't be sure.

Then there is the atheist who lacks a belief in a god or gods.

Okay. Not quite what I meant. How would you characterize the site, not yourself? What's the overall tone of the site based on posts you've read?

Honestly, I would say based on polls I've seen like the one where at the time I voted more people stated the knew 100% that there was no god, the site might be nearly as dogmatically ignorant as a fundamental religious one. So, in that regard, I'd probably go with atheist.

I disagree. I also reject the term "agnostic atheism," as I see them as mutually exclusive.

bingst, how can you see the terms as mutually exclusive? The terms aren't on the same continuum. "Theism" - "atheism" is one polarity regarding belief or non-belief in a deity. "Gnosticism" - "agnosticism" is a separate polarity about whether or not you feel that you actually know that your beliefs are true. ZenBear addresses this above. There are four categories: gnostic theist, gnostic atheist, agnostic theist, agnostic atheist.

"I don't know" could be construed as agnostic whereas No could not

There is no contradiction between atheism & agnosticism. None. If you cannot answer in the affirmative to the question 'Do you think that there is a God?' you don't believe in one. You cannot say 'I don't know' & expect that to mean 'Yes'. If the question was 'Do you have significant doubt about claims a God exists & therefore can't say you believe?' it's the same as not being able to actually say 'Yes' when asked if you believe there's a God. It really IS that simple so there's no contradiction between being an atheist & being agnostic. I'm an agnostic atheist myself but only in the trivial sense in as much as I don't believe claims a Loch Ness Monster exists but am I 100% certain there isn't one? No. I try not to be 100% certain of anything & wouldn't even want to be as regards anything I may be mistaken about. I just doubt that I am when god claims are made.