Agnostic.com

3 1

Have you noticed this common logical fallacy?

Have you observed that a common error in reasoning occurs when trying to resolve the cognitive dissonance of having made a poor or suboptimal decision? The argument goes like this:

  • I did "a'
  • "b" is morally equivalent or worse than "a"
    -Therefore, "a" is good or at least permissible.

To choose a couple of extreme examples:
-I may rob people, but the government also robs people by taxing their hard earned income.
-or-
-I may rob people, but at least I haven't killed anyone.

Diogenes1972 6 Nov 20
Share

Enjoy being online again!

Welcome to the community of good people who base their values on evidence and appreciate civil discourse - the social network you will enjoy.

Create your free account

3 comments

Feel free to reply to any comment by clicking the "Reply" button.

0

yes, we have noticed.

g

2

Yeah it's a similar non-sequitur to "he did it first" or "she started it".

0

It is an intentional tactic often used to try to reduce guilt.

You can include a link to this post in your posts and comments by including the text q:227537
Agnostic does not evaluate or guarantee the accuracy of any content. Read full disclaimer.