That's interesting. He sat down next to David Silverman I would not have him to have been there.
The best thing he said was that the vote was about if religion does harm in society not about whether it was capable of doing good. This is often the argument made when an atheist states that religion does harm. The truth of the statement is simply ignored and justified by saying that religion can do good.
The time has come for all people to stop accepting or "tolerating" superstition and fraud, and instead, to call it what it is. It is time to state clearly that God is imaginary. Religion is pure superstition, nothing more -- It is time for us to begin eliminating the superstition and fraud from public discourse, for the simple reason that superstition and fraud are detrimental to society.
In principle I agree. In practice, I'm not so sure that it wouldn't just create a backlash because society isn't ready to have its kiddie toys taken from it. In fact I think we are living out something of a backlash against rationalism / empiricism which was gaining some purchase. This alarmed the reactionary elements of theism and now we are entering what may be a lengthy period of regression in the form of Trumpism and other expressions of white nationalism, xenophobia and anti-secularism around the world.
I think calling a spade a spade is generally a good thing but I don't know if it's sustainable unless humanity does a good deal more evolving. At the same time, evolution / development / maturation DO come from putting away childish things. I'm conflicted about how to proceed as a society. Indeed, the US is such a polarized society there may be no consensus on which TO proceed. I just hope it's not our undoing.