Do you lean more towards science fiction or science fantasy when reading? What are some of your favorite book recommendations in those two categories?
Hmm... I would prefer Science fantasy more than Science fiction. The more specific ones are those set in other realities, or other universes. They give a relief from our reality bound by laws and reasons by defying them. I don't read books on fictions and fantasy, but I prefer to watch in movies and series.
I love both science fiction and science fantasy my current series I'm listening to on Audible is schooled in Magic by Christopher G. Nuttall. A girl gets summoned from Earth by a necromancer in another Realm and some of the things she comes up with magic wise from what she knows about science from Earth is quite interesting.
The Science fiction section in my local library is down to one and a half shelves, from 10 shelves when I moved here 30 years ago. And most of those are like the 17th installment of The Gzornenplatz Universe. And two really great SF books (actually one book and one rapid-fire trilogy), The book of Good New Things and the Southern Reach trilogy are not listed as SF. I blame Harlan Ellison for this.
I agree with you about SciFi shelves dwindling but how does Harlan Ellison fit into it this?
@buzz13 Ellison made "literary" soft sci-fi (which often has no science element) more acceptable as sci-fi.
I also blame Star Trek for initiating the push toward the mess of expanded/shared universe writing that's overrun Science Fiction sections in bookstores.
It might be a function of getting older, but I can hardly bear to read fantasy anymore.
If the book doesn't touch on or reveal some sort of understanding of physics, history, etc, it gets binned.
Life is too amazing to miss out on learning more about it.
I lean more toward hard Science Fiction. All my devices in my stories have some basis in reality. For more hard Science Fiction check out Alistair Reynolds or Arthur C. Clarke. For fantasy, pretty much anything with Star Wars in the title.
Science Fiction is a "pre-genre." In the case of Star Wars there's little science involved, but it is there. The fantasy comes from the main premise for the stories, "wizards" battling for a hold of the galaxy. Wall-e could be considered a Science Fiction Romance Comedy.
Either as long as I enjoy the characters and story.
I read/write both. Isaac Asimov, Iain M. Banks, Douglas Adams are some of my favourites.
Philip K. Dick, Robert Heinlein, Jules Verne, Arthur C. Clarke, Larry Niven. My take on these guys are Science Fiction someday to be Science Fact. Even the original Star Trek had stuff that was fiction then, but fact now. The tablet computer he signs whenever the Yoeman comes around for instance. I even proposed a phone called the 'the communicator' for a startup telecom, basically a flip phone that looks like Kirk's communicator. Think about this - smart phones today are more advanced than the fictional communicator in Star Trek!
It depends on my mood. Lately it's been sci-fi horror for me, which could go either way depending on the writer or story.
Both are fine. I tend to steer clear of shared universe/franchise books unless I can't find something else.
If a book has a lot of "hard scifi" science stuff it needs to be consistent enough that I don't feel like there are holes in it, locally.
I love all kinds of fiction, when I have time to read....which isn't that often.
I always prefer the plausibility of science fiction if I want fantasy i prefer it be along the mythological line.
I am a hard SciFi fan all the way, I have started reading a novel and suddenly some Grand High Exalted Mystic Ruler comes along and invokes the God of Hixlumee and saves the day. Yuk!
My favorite novels are about Generation Ships. Some of the old classics are; Non-Stop by Brian Aldiss, Orphans of the Sky by R. Heinlein, Captive Universe by Harry Harrison. There is a website somewhere that has an up to date list.
So where does Anne McCaffrey fall? Currently rereading "To Ride Pegasus". Written as SF but feels fantasy. I think the distinction is so artificial as to be meaningless anywhere but the extremes. Add to that the burgeoning plethora of sub-genres (military SF, Urban Fantasy etc) and the reading rapidly becomes more about taxonomy than entertainment.
I've read a few of her books and I really enjoyed them! I would say she's more fantasy myself though.
@geeky1965 That's certainly the feel I get, but then Ursula Le Guin and MZB both wrote SF with a similar feel.
Science fantasy "well of souls" series, and "Lord of Light" well worth reading
Sci fi, I recently read the "Gap" series, first time I read a strait sci fi since my teens, it was good.
Lord of Light was one of my favorite novels. Read it numerous times. Still can't believe there wasn't a movie released of it.
"His followers called him Mahasamatman and said he was a god, he preferred to drop the maha- and the -Atman, however, and called himself Sam."
I liked when he was gambling with the demonas, and just loved, "and then the fit really hit the Shan" and the bit about the family who were saving their excrement up for when they had the sewer connected to advance their karma.
Depends on the system. Things must be logical for its universe and rules must stay consistent. I do love Seaman McGuire and Tom Holt and James Alan Gardner and Scott Westerfeld for how they construct their worlds.
Science fiction is Arthur c Clarke,Rendezvous with Rama , Science fantasy is Dune by Frank Herbert