I had to do some digging on this one. A very 'deep' question. What I've found that perhaps best describes my view is truth = unconcealment. As far as news reports go (fake news, propaganda, etc), I look at sources, ones I mostly trust. And the 'truth' is never fully known, you can only get close. The 'truth' is an aspiration.

I consider truth a word with ambiguous meanings when used by most people. In my personal definition, its a property of any proposition or statement made. So in our every day speech we could say this characteristic belongs to this group. (All religions believe in a God) and we consider it true if we want to or not. And that is how far most people want to take logic. But if you consider testing all logical cases of something you can reword everything and test a huge system of thoughts with logical analysis. And in this sense you find the truth for a system of beliefs based on the assumptions in that belief system. For example, For all Abrahamic religions there exists at least one God and one book saying this is true. So in reality while people purport beliefs they usually do so with a very personal motive. This its not surprising more and more groups are making their own belief systems in order to get their own personal motives fulfilled.

IN short, I would say anything considered true must be have an entity declaring it to be true. An immutable and unseen entity that will do what we want. As if I say its true , you may say its not. But having an entity that is immutable is great because its not like you can ask that entity.... In that sense the only way to get a truth that is not tied to an ontology of transcendental beings, is to experiment with logic..

In the world today, truth has become more subjective than ever. Open to interpretation and the whims and fancies of the individual. Has it then lost it's meaning ? In many cases, yes.

"Then, what is truth? Is truth Unchanging Law? We both have truth. Are mine the same as yours?" - Sir Timothy Miles Bindon Rice

To me truth is any fact that can be verified by independent observation and or measurement. Truth is never just hearsay, it requires empirical data and first hand witnesses.

truth is our interpretation of our reality, it's what we perceive to be true. while facts just are, and are not subject to emotional interpretation. so truth can depend on our emotions, while facts are rock solid and are, well...facts, lol.

the hypothesis with the most tangible and credible evidence.

I like the definition I've heard most from Matt Dillahunty. Truth is that which comports to reality.

A myth. One as great as religion.
There is subjective reality, where something is more likely to be "real" than something else, and claims that are demonstrably false. But what is true, or unerring, is a thing born of perspective.