Yes, and yes.

If a man does it right, then a woman will most likely have more pleasure and enjoyment than a man.

I will say as a man that it certainly appears to me that women don't find sex to be much of a priority. But that's just my very limited experience pool. I seem to have unconsciously selected for women with intimacy avoidance issues.

I had some great sexual experiences with my second wife for instance, because when I married her, she was at her sexual peak, and the illness that she eventually died of hadn't overtaken her yet. But you could take it to the bank that if we had any sort of meaningful intimacy, whether it involved sex or not, sometime within 48 hours she would do some self-sabotage and pick some kind of ridiculous fight usually involving reading into some innocuous thing I (failed to) do that shows I didn't REALLY care about her. In other words it was as if a caring, loving attentiveness to her having a good experience violated some core beliefs about herself; by inviting her to trust, it would scare her. And sure enough ... her father, who she worshipped, had abandoned her and her mother when she was a child. So any man she feels close to might do the same thing. And she was emotionally childish around this issue.

It is this emotional complexity that I think frustrates men. We are simple creatures, we just want to enjoy the sexual aspect of the relationship and have our partner show the mutuality of that enjoyment by responding to our advances, and what we often get instead pretty much regardless of the sensitivity and effort we invest is all this hedging and suspicion, or, sometimes, we get dutiful wooden compliance with little reciprocity. Also women know the power they have to wound us, and in my experience and observation they are more than willing to use it. This does not exactly encourage openness, trust, and vulnerability from men, who are ALREADY disinclined to be open / vulnerable / emotional because of the way we're raised / socialized.

Sure many men are pigs, or ignorant, or both. But I am neither, and was willing to invest deeply in my partners, and they were not so invested or willing. And I can only go by my own experience. It took my whole adult life to get there, but I am now indifferent about sex too. It's just another overrated aspect of the romance industry.

I think my conclusion on the matter is that at least here in America we are so sexually repressed, patriarchal, inhibited and just generally fucked up, that it's amazing we keep coming back for more.

Slow... I was not going to comment because always found that type of question... in the stupid side and unable to be resolved. A nymphomaniac will beat the horniest man in the world anytime. The fact that women reach their peak in their 40's and men at 18? ...let's say 20's but there is a reason why let's say 20's and not 18. Why it takes that long to women to understand their body? I admit the escapades me and my before to be wife did were for the record and we chased personal bests many times, even after marriage and kids. So I had to say You will Peak at the Moment you meet your match. I realized she was the lab room and experiment partner to extent and expand things for me and me for her. If you ask her... she will tell you she didn't peaked at her 40's. You Peak when the opportunity via a willing partner is there. Forget what you see in TV. That is not Real Bro! A woman that peak at her 40's is because she didn't have a man or woman before to bring it out of her earlier. I know... I had seen it myself. Not on TV.