Male circumcision, no matter what reason is barbaric and primitive.What's your take?
It can be performed on a child only for a valid medical reason .Religious excused or the old chestnut about hygiene are not validAn adult can choose if he so wishes .
What about reason: medical? we had our son circumcised because his foreskin was extremely long, and a very small hole at the end. He would have had trouble with normal sex and even during urination.
Circumcised, he is rather more normal in that area and need not worry about it.
Otherwise I would say no reason.
That would be a good reason, was a partial one out of the question or did that just not come up as am option?
@Tesseract Honestly, it was a rough time and that was a trivial question really. I have boy/girl twins that were born @28weeks. Gus was 1lb 4oz and Olivia was 1lb 10oz.
They had a lot of other challenges that were far more critical, and I don't really recall if there was discussion about a partial.
One pet peeve of mine is referring to them as "Miracle Babies"
They were a fuckload of hard work babies, both for us and modern medicine. God, since he is not real, did nothing. I am too nice to call them out on it though, I don't like to argue that kind of stuff in person, too much like conflict, lol.
agree completely, I am amazed that people are willing to let it happen at all, and compare the outcry re female circumcision. I want to sue my parents and the doctors
Unless that child/person has recurrent infections that is.
@BinaGee Mine was not mutilated, mine was liberated. My take, about Mine.
@GipsyOfNewSpain That's cool for you. But it must be a choice, not done to children too young to consent. Consent matters.
@BinaGee I can tell you this... I had never met a man that remembers the pain of circumcision, I asked my son... he don't remember. I told my story in another post of same theme... I finished mine when maybe 10 or so maybe later. With a shaving blade, cut by cut it was painful but felt it was what I wanted to do. Never said anything about it until a previous post about same theme. It felt it was what needed to be done. I wasn't told, I didn't read... Since I left the military I haven't gotten a vaccine. And you guys kind of associate vaccines to circumcision? I take circumcision over vaccine... the way you put it. And it was not Mutilation, It was Liberation. Next time choose a topic like breast implants, adults decisions.
I didn't have any say in it, but all I know is I didn't walk for a year afterwards.
I believe it fits the definition of both of those words. If I had a son I would probably consider not circumcising him. All that said, I am circumcised and I don't feel horribly wronged by it. I'm not it's the battle that I would choose to have.
We are at it Again? We just discussed this a week ago. Can't people check previous posts? Come on people!
I've read where circumcision was the prime indicator the Nazis used to identify Jewish boys. And I've even heard of Jewish boys trying to re-arrange things to look as if they weren't. To have a crime committed on a male, then be executed because of it, is ironic. As for me, I'm glad that I never had the procedure. And, there are times when its been a bonus - when a woman will only relate to non-cut males. Hooray!
We are not in Germany anymore!!!!
My take is if there is no problem then leave it be, although I've never had a son and so haven't had to be involved in the decision. I'm sure If I'd had a son I would have made a joint decision with the boy's father.
Did you see that Iceland is proposing to make it illegal? Link: [usatoday.com]
Outside of medical necessity, it shouldn't be done. Female genital mutilation is frowned upon. Why isn't male?
*I don't have offspring, but if I did, or ever do, my son(s) will/would not be circumcised.
I refused to have my sons, born in 1989 and 1990 circunscised. My husband ,who had been circumscised as a newborn, was fully in agreement. Having lived many years in Europe showed me that this ridiculous procedure on our boys is unnecessary and cruel.
Male circumcision has been important in the control of hiv/aids in Africa. Plus unlike FGM it's sole purpose is not for control and subjugation. Not a battle l will choose to have too. Also, terms like barbaric and primitive are loaded.... pretty certain there are other practices that will be considered in the same light.
that's a lie..actually, if I didn't grew up in Africa,I would agree.
I had to be circumcised at about 15 because I literally couldn't see my bell end at all and when I pissed it blew up like a balloon. I was quite a young 15 too ie underdeveloped so took me ages to say anything and think of what to say. I remember after the operation I had stitches made of like fishing line that fell out when the wound had healed. they really dug into my underwear and itched like fuck. not good but I laugh about it now.