FTA: There are plenty of atheists who would have eagerly accepted that challenge and responded to the kids’ questions. Instead, this counselor avoided an actual discussion about religious differences and made the kids think they had a firm grasp on their side of the debate.
It’s not just patronizing, it’s a sign of defeat. These people are so afraid to put their beliefs under actual scrutiny that they had to bring in someone who could easily be “beaten” just for the sake of show. What does that accomplish? And why avoid an actual atheist?
They've been bearing false witness for much of their lives. This is just one more log on the fire.
The use of a foil is quite common. Plato and Galileo both used them in a phoney debate to promote their ideas. The difference here is the deception involved. Of course they could not have invited a real atheist, the risks would been too great. Although some of the guys from the conservative group on here might have been dumb enough to get their arses kicked by kids.