Space contains trace amounts of matter throughout the universe. It’s primarily very hot (hundreds of thousands of degrees), coronal-like gas in most locations between galaxies. Once created, coronal gas lacks effective cooling mechanisms and is incredibly transparent, making the universe appear cold (3 Kelvin), the cosmic microwave radiation from the cooling down after the Big Bang. In addition to ordinary matter, there are neutrinos and other exotic particles zipping through ever volume of space along with radiation. Moreover, there is ten times more dark matter than ordinary matter in each volume and more dark energy than dark matter by three fold on average.
Space itself has structure, a sea teaming with quantum mechanical interactions and fluctuations. Both space and time were created in the Big Bang. There was no time prior to the BB and no way to be “outside” of the BB watching creation of the universe unfold.
This is a fascinating discussion, with a profound and astute truth being presented by a qualified physicist, and that truth being denied by those who cling to a shallow world view where space, time, and matter are taken to be primary and are not to be questioned. The irony is that the shallow world view is thought to be scientific by its adherents, and they dismiss the statements of the scientist as being unscientific.
I see space, time and things as being modes of thought. In ultimate reality beyond our senses those concepts have little or no meaning. Read “Reality is not What it Seems” by physicist Carlo Rovelli. One of his chapters is entitled “Time does not exist”.
IMO the practice of dogmatic scientism is based on ignorance and bigotry far worse than any religion.
Very true, but they have many counter arguments and refuse to acknowledge reason
@TheAstroChuck them
Hey Chuck, You're never going to win a religious argument with reason. Time is infinite because "something" had to have existed before the big bang and they accept this as a matter of faith The only evidence they are willing to accept is that you prove that "nothing" exists and they are blind to the logical paradox of their own position.
no time before the Big Bang? tell me about the trillions of years before the BB -
@TheAstroChuck you clearly don't understand time
@TheAstroChuck funny , that's the same reaction I have when I read about your views of the universe.
I find this all fascinating and yet hard to understand at the same time. Religion cops out by saying there god has always existed. What if the universe has always existed and there is no need of gods?
@johnprytz Time is infinite because I say so is not a good argument in the face of the big bang that traces it back to it's start. Actually if it wasn't false it might be a good argument for the existence of god. What happened before the beginning is the same argument as if all this exists it had to have a creator. If the universe depends on an infinite existence of time and matter it would include all possibilities including god. Who created god? The lack of an answer, doesn't make an opinion true.
My mind doesn’t know what to do with “no time”.
the idea of no time is illogical - if you think time isn't a constant, then you don't understand time. the idea of a pre time is retarded.
@TheAstroChuck
Thanks, but I don’t have the background to understand that or what it has to do with time not existing.
wrong - space and time are infinite - there was no beginning of the universe.
"wrong - space and time are infinite - there was no beginning of the universe." And we are supposed to take your word for it...no rationale, no counter theory, etc. Just like you are the sage on the mountain top.
@TheAstroChuck as I told you before - einsteins special theory is flawed. you probably need to stay away from theories and build your view of the universe based on facts.
Officially the my god is better arguement for Athiest unfolding in the forums, it's my concept of the universe and its being.
So, from a practical engineering point of view, a really fast space ship needs a bulldozer blade mounted on her bow?
@TheAstroChuck
Maybe more like a "cow-catcher" then. I see your point there Chuck.