Agnostic.com

2 2

LINK Climate-change sceptic says they should have right to 'mislead public' because of free speech | The Independent

This kind of attitude is why social media is startign to crack down on misleading propaganda and hate speech.

snytiger6 9 Apr 5
Share

Enjoy being online again!

Welcome to the community of good people who base their values on evidence and appreciate civil discourse - the social network you will enjoy.

Create your free account

2 comments

Feel free to reply to any comment by clicking the "Reply" button.

1

You don't have the right to endanger people in the name of free speech, and this is what deniers are doing.

0

there is "junk science" from both sides. they both have an agenda. can't understand why more ppl can't understand that.

Agenda of persons who believer Climate change is real... We want the earth to still be habitable for humans for more than another 500 years.

Agenda for climate change deniers... We want fossil fule companies to continue to make large profits. We cont' want to learn new stuff.

@snytiger6 ,
agenda: for govts who badly need revenues, get those scary reports out there so that the public won't complain too much about a costly carbon tax which canada just imposed.
agenda: for global warming scientists keep putting out the scary reports, many of which have totally failed to materialize, so that they can keep receiving govt grants/subsidies.

@callmedubious Some reports mae some pretty loftey predictions, but most predicted exactly what is hhappening. Greater temperature variations with both hotter summers and colder winters (although th e4average global temperature will continue to gradually rise) . More and stronger storms. This last winter beign extrely cold int he Northern hemisphere, ws matched by an extremely hot summer inthe southern hemisphere. They say now that things are happening (changing) faster than predicted.

Granted the possiblity of human extinction is probably at least 500 yers out. But the risk is real.

@callmedubious
Dubious you have no concept about research grants are, applird for, approved and dispersed. A terrible oversimplification of the process. 90% of world scientists are not in collusion to falsify data to justify their resestch grants.

You can include a link to this post in your posts and comments by including the text q:325179
Agnostic does not evaluate or guarantee the accuracy of any content. Read full disclaimer.