Agnostic.com

2 0

Enjoy being online again!

Welcome to the community of good people who base their values on evidence and appreciate civil discourse - the social network you will enjoy.

Create your free account

2 comments

Feel free to reply to any comment by clicking the "Reply" button.

0

@THHA

[gppi.net]

The OPCW may well have found that the Douma attack was staged. Indeed, the linked report shows that somewhere between a third to two/thirds could have been faked by the rebels. However, the report notes nearly 500 attacks were considered and, while 162 were uncorroborated or dismissed, 111 were comprehensively confirmed. So yeah, maybe the OPCW report discounted that one attack, but you're inferring that Assad hasn't used any gas! I admit I'm gullible to a degree, but I'm willing to suspect that at least one or more illegal and immoral gas attacks were committed by Assad. Assad is a monster. I love a good conspiracy, but I don't think I'm the gullible one to imagine that all 500 attacks were faked. What would be the motive in being an apologist for Assad?

What would be the motive for framing Assad? . . . . [ecowatch.com]

The motive for framing Assad would be to get his international opponents to react with a retaliatory strike, sending a message that using chemical weapons is (supposedly) a violation of international norms.

0

Russia supports Assad and his use of chemical weapons. RT is Russia. Taking this report at face value invites criticism. What is interesting is the involvement of the celebrities, who have distinguished themselves on other occasions. My recollection is that the reporting of the chemical attacks presented numerous witnesses.

When you find were in the UN report that incriminates Assad, we will take you seriously. As it stands, there is no such conclusion from the UN. The US propaganda works pretty good on the gullible though. [un.org]

You can include a link to this post in your posts and comments by including the text q:349465
Agnostic does not evaluate or guarantee the accuracy of any content. Read full disclaimer.