A limited study like this screams bias in the basic way it is construceted - no control group or comparison with where hilary held a rally - no stats from prior to rallies -
Sounds like bad science in the way the study was done - may well be that the fundamental statement is correct - but equally possible the same happened where hilary visited, or where neither visited - or that hate crime generally increased by more..... or less
would like to read the PhD and tear away at the edges of the holes - anyone I was supervising (long ago, different subject) would have been directed to look wider to make the stats and conclusions bullet proof

No shit that's what he is hate

No surprise given the level of intelligence of the people he appeals to.

I do think he has basically opened the doors for already inclined bigoted criminals to carry out their crimes by either making innuendos, jokes, or being complicit in his silence against such crimes...

I have been following the Southern Poverty stats for years and have seen a rise in the number of such crimes...but, in fairness, I think he just lifted the lid off the kettle that was already boiling from years of pent up frustrations...

What a BS study! Zero statistics, no correlation, just a conclusion. Very scientific!