Agnostic.com

7 4

Trump's ban on Chinese telecom giant Huawei could cut off rural Americans' cell service

"The rural areas are going to not get served, and it puzzles me why these senators ... don’t see the problem here,” a former FCC commissioner said.

[nbcnews.com]

LiterateHiker 9 May 27
Share

Enjoy being online again!

Welcome to the community of good people who base their values on evidence and appreciate civil discourse - the social network you will enjoy.

Create your free account

7 comments

Feel free to reply to any comment by clicking the "Reply" button.

1

Less twitter followers for the twitler in chief...

It will probably mean that the mergers that many of the telecommunication companies seek will happen...prices will rise for everyone much as it did when AT&T was a huge monopoly back in the 1970's...Trump is for his rich buddies, not the people who voted for him...

2

Lack of reliable high speed internet is big impediment for companies and people to move to rural areas. I could theoretically live anywhere there is high speed internet available to do my work. My little home town has a fixed number of DSL ports the local telephone company has. All others make do with cell hotspot coverage, but at much cost.

Ohub Level 7 May 27, 2019
0

Maybe. On the other hand not to ban the socialist Chinese scum will cut off our freedom! Hope he bans all the poisonous Chicom products!

zesty Level 7 May 27, 2019
1

If the Democratic Presidential Candidates don't run with this ball, I don't know what to think about our future. Please tell me the rural vote can be captured again by Progressives in 2020. A platform must include how to provide low cost cell service and WiFi to all....and it should be based in the U.S. Just like expanding better medical care and mental health services to rural areas, which is currently part of the Progressive agenda.

Electricity came to where I grew up after WWII - the REA brought electricity in to the sparsely populated rural areas. Both my mother and father remembered being young with no electricity. I think people would get behind this effort; but with the FoxNews "SOCIALIST GUMMINT LIBRUL TAKEOVER" crowd, I fear the folks who need this the most would cut off their nose to spite their face.

@Ohub I fear you are correct. If it has to be called some other word, let's come up with it before 2020. I think the unfounded fear that the government is 'taking over' and 'threatening liberty' will be thrown aside if they get hooked up to reliable low cost cell phone and WiFi coverage, right? ha

1

Will the real storys ever be known

2

I don't want to belittle a perceived threat but
I humbly submit this shows how weak our
cyber infrastructure really is! Trying to close the door after the horse left the barn is worse
than doing nothing-the administration gets publicity for doing what amounts to making the problem worse!!!To have a knowledgable
person recognize the repercussions shows that there ARE BETTER WAYS to resolve the
issues. Thanks

3

Typical politically inspired cock-up.

Write Comment
You can include a link to this post in your posts and comments by including the text q:352879
Agnostic does not evaluate or guarantee the accuracy of any content. Read full disclaimer.