Nobody can be 100% about anything really. You have to make your decisions based on the information and evidence you have in front of you. I'm an atheist because I don't have evidence that their is a God. Not because I'm rebellious. Pascal's wager doesn't help anybody. My thoughts about God and the bible is that if that God in the bible really existed, and the bible was completely true and not fables, he doesn't deserve any type of praise or worship at all. He was a genocidal maniac according to his precious book. Read the bible for yourself, and see what type of god you believe in.

My actions are atheistic in nature. When I make a decision it is based on my senses and what I know about a naturalistic existence. My ignorance of the existence of a supreme being and its baffling plan that involves things like eye cancer and wasps is irrelevant to my decision making process.
Aron Ra put it simply. Atheism means without religion. As such I am an atheist who acts on what knowledge that can be demonstrated. I try not to let my ignorance interfere.

Yes you are a mis-informed Atheist and the typical Agnostic claims the word amidst false xian definitions of Atheism. There is no need to capitalize the gibberish sounds gawd gott gods. There is no evidence for the allegations regarding alleged deities Thor Apollo APHRODITE yhwh geebush jeehobah ghostholes........so you are trapped in a false conundrum.....searching for knowledge about nothing....trapped into the "proof" of a negative....the burden of proof ALWAYS FALLS UPON THE ALLEGING PARTY.....the xian dictionaries all falsely claim we Atheists "deny" an extant deity......to be an Atheist is to have zero theism inside your brain and so do Agnostics.....I walk in doors without any need for beliefs ABOUT doors because doors exist...."belief in" is a non-sequitur and syntax error.....the truth is best stated by Atheist Mark Twain: " faith is believing whatcha know ain't so " ....Agnostics and Atheists are proper nouns (unlike xians) we who have zero faiths. Period.

I'm both or on the Dawkins' scale someone shared a De-Facto Atheist

I am a non-theist, which is now the proper term for atheist. The Christians have misrepresented the definition of atheist to the point where the misrepresentation became the prevailing definition. Assholes.

What really matters is what humans should supposedly do if a God exists. Currying favor to get wishes (prayers) fulfilled does not seem especially spiritual or transcendent. And yet, that amounts to most of what religion is all about: rank superstition.

God, real or not, is irrelevant to our lives. (Say it isn't so, but if you do, have some decent evidence or something better than a fallacious argument.

If you seek clarity, study math, or any other science.

Basicall atheism is disbelief. And agnosticism is unknown. So a/theist a~ being the direct negation from the Greek prefix is believer or not a believer. While a/gnostic is known or not known. One could be an agnostic atheist. And if someone asks if you believe in god and you say anything but some version of yes you are an atheist.

No one can KNOW if god exists or not. He, she, it, maybe hiding under a rock on Venus. Which is why I actually don’t even like the label agnostic. ( a = without / gnos = knowledge. ) Many times I’ve actually seen it ( agnostic ) used by atheists who just don’t want to offend any theists present. Theists generally don’t care to hide who they are as beliefs in an invisible Superman is widely accepted.

Q Is there a god?
A I don't know, I'm and agnostic.
Q Do you believe in a god?
A No, I'm an atheist.

There are atheist agnostics and there are theist agnostics. I'm an atheist agnostic.

Theism is about belief, Gnosticism is about knowledge. Therefore you can be a agnostic theist (ie believe there is a god but not know there is) or you can be an agnostic atheist (ie not believe there is a god but not know whether or not there is). Just to say you're an agnostic about a god only tells us that you cannot know if there is one, not what you believe or accept.

I am a scientist meaning that I am still searching and learning. That covers all that I need to become a Humanist and Agnostic.

We do have to think more about exactly how we describe ourselves. If possible reduce the number of descriptive words without limiting our freedom of expression. Unfortunately some words carry "baggage".