Only the use of "ism" in your statement would make it a philosophy, not a god... false or otherwise. Also science is not a god. It's a set of regulations, tests and tools to explore an understand our world as much as it is to advance technologies to try to better our world. Do some misuse those tools? Absolutely. Do some put a higher importance on science over people... no question. That still does not mean science will have all the answer straight up or that it should be seen as a literal god or even as a religion. To say so would mean you have a gross misunderstanding about what science is for, or how those in the field might see it.

Is there scientific evidence to consider the traditional religious conceptions of sexuality are antiscientific? Is there evidence to consider, for example, that the intersexuality spectrum implies that non-reproductive sexuality is natural and improves human health?

Quote:

Feyerabend objected to the claim tha science is superior to other modes of knowledge. He hated the tendency of western states to foist the products of science -- whether the theory of evolution or nuclear power plants-- on people against their will. "There is separation between state and church", he cried, but none "between state and science!"

Source:

Scientific American. Was philosopher Paul Feyerabend really "science's worst enemy"? October 24 / 2016.

Science doesn't have all the answers, and properly does not claim to. It tells us, e.g., how to build atomic bombs, but not whether we SHOULD. That's the provenance of philosophy, in my view, not religion. Philosophy in general is far "squishier" than science but at least tries to take an unbiased look at what is harmful or beneficial in various courses of action and thought. The presuppositionalism inherent in most religion, and the nature of religious faith as an epistemology, makes its advice more prone to be off-base, all things being equal.

Nah! It does have a lot of the questions though

Of course science does not have all the answers. But the scientific approach to problem solving has all the intellectual beauty imaginable.

Learning is an ongoing process. It is extremely unlikely that Humans, or any Alien species will ever know everything about the Universe.

Why would anyone regard 'science' as a god .??
Science is a process of rigorous thought, experimentation and critical analysis to extend knowledge ... it does not have all the answers .. partly because we don't yet know the questions ... partly because we are presently unable to precisely define an answer to questions we are asking.

The questions that concern me most can’t be answered by science or by anything else. I think those questions lie outside human purview and might be meaningless from a higher perspective. Religion, science, and philosophy might shine the light of awareness on those questions, resulting in awe and reverence, but there really are no answers. The questions are what matter because they can shake people awake.

If a person doesn’t want to face the startling facts of existence, then fear can be blunted with either scientism or religious dogma—really the same thing. It’s your choice.

If you frame questions that matter as things that are metaphysical or philosophical, then science has no answers whatsoever.

If you focus only questions based in reality, there is potentially no limit to the questions that science can answer.

I don't think that metaphysical questions really matter that much when our reality is molded by science and the questions asked by philosophy are based on the perception of that reality.

Also, I would argue that science can make determinations about things like morality, because you can ( in theory for now ) test what happens to a group of people under different moral conditioning, and see the results.

For example, you could test what happens to a society that has little genetic and no cultural diverity, and compare that to a society with high genetic and cultural diveristy, with a statistical average as a control group, and see how these societies develop.

No single area of human activity has all the answers to everything.

Of course not. neither does Jesus or his Daddy.

Science will NEVER have all the answers. The cool thing about science is that it creates 20 new questions for every one it answers.

Science is a process used to determine how things work. Once you add an "ism" it falsely becomes something which can be worshipped.

There no "G" or "O" or "D" in "Science."

We don't know yet what science can answer, but we need to continue asking to find out, as the process continues.

No, but it has all the right questions!