I am all for threesomes. Is HE going to join us as man or a woman?

You mean after I finished laughing?

or the classical Agnostic answer for everything that includes god...

"Which god?"

Where do they get the idea that god is love? Genocidal, sacrificial, misogynist, and many more. How is that love?

I’d say that’s bullshit!

I would ask, "Without what?"

I won't . No reason for . He made a statement . Rude .
He did not asked any question , HE TOLD U GUYS what is gonna be , what it is .
Such ways to speak , such statements are not worthy of an answer in my book .

Methinks, he is actually incapable of true love and is desperately searching for it.

I would bluntly state: What utter nonsense. That assertion makes as much sense as stating, "You can't swim without learning to ride your bicycle." them ask them to try to define the characteristics of "true love" and have them justify why this condition is dependent on the existence of a god.

You REALLY need to come out! You need to stop abusing yourself.

What would I say? I'd say that is horse shit! What would I say in the middle of church services? Nothing!!! I wouldn't be there!

What nonsense. If that was true how come God lets small children suffer or how come he "invented" this parasite that bores into children's eyes and makes them go blind, etc, etc. Ask that.

My late wife and I married at a Ministers house,and never in our 27 years of marriage attended any Churches,no major fights, some disagreements, but for the most part we got along very well.

Answer: which god? Odin? Zeus? Thor?

I understand people that haven’t come out as nonbelievers to family and friends but I don’t understand why that means you still have to go to church? Plenty of believers that don’t go.

But of course! If true love equals raping children.

Sounds like an old cliché spoken by people with no self-esteem and who hate or reject themselves.

I would respond that this is “absolutely ridiculous.”

The claim there is no "true love" is nonsense. Can you love without religion?

Can you poop without mayonnaise?

Non sequiturs. Religion didn't invent emotions. Social evolution and biological evolution did.

It depends on the person/circumstances but most likely I wouldn't even engage in such discussion

Actually true love comes from knowing oneself and understanding that there is no need for ethereal beings to have true love.

I wouldn’t waste my breath talking to someone that ignorant unless it were perhaps my mother, but hypothetically since another non believer is asking: I’d say you can’t have true love with god. If god is always first then you can’t love a person more than anything else, like I’m free to do. It’s also impossible to have true love for god. Your primary reasons for wanting to love god are always going to be that you’re afraid of eternal punishment if you don’t, and/or you’re convinced he made some kind of incredible sacrifice of himself for you. So you’ve been coerced and/or guilted into the feeling. Doesn’t sound like any true love I’d want to be apart of.

The even more objective standpoint is that no one thing called true love exists for anyone. It all has a selfish imperative as the end goal no matter how selfless the feeling seems. There are many kinds of love, and they all have a biological imperative. Agape, the loving kindness we have toward others, is apart of our instincts as social animals to cooperate and want to see each other do well because it’s good for us. Romantic love is a chemical trick of the brain to make you stick around and care for your partner and young as a smaller scale version of the cooperation needed to survive.

We are wired with an endogenous chemical reward system to give us a hit of the feel goods when we do something that promotes our survival. The same way exercise feels good, love is a function of our reproductive instincts. When some of us lose interest or cheat those are functions of our reproductive instincts just the same. No type of instinct is morally superior to another. They just are what they are. Religious people just like to think they have the only valid reason for fucking: to make more soldiers of the cross, which they so willingly like to rush to the front lines. Make sure to keep having those babies, cause it’s not love if you aren’t photocopying your mediocre ass.

Love is truer when no god is involved.

I would ignore it. Just as I ignore the ramblings of any idiot as long as they have no power. I learned long ago not to argue with people that want to define the terms of the debate on their terms only. It is like trying to teach a pig to sing, not only is it a waste of time, but it irritates the pig. Pick your battles, some are worth fighting, most are not.

How would they set about proving such a claim? It is as empty as any testamony that God lives and loves us or that the Bible is inerrant. It's also completely self serving, egotistical, and elitest.