At least someone is putting in print what some of us have known all along.
The US is in Syria illegally and is "protecting" the oil from Syria, not for Syria.
One more straw to break a congressperson's back, I hope.
If this browser extension is installed : [newsguardtech.com] , I think rt.com would be ignored by critical thinkers.
@SeaGreenEyez Have you read NewsGuard's full report about rt.com ?
It is lengthy, but here is the first sentence :
RT is owned by Moscow-based ANOTV-Novosti, described on the RT.com About Us page as an “autonomous, non-profit organization that is publicly financed from the budget of the Russian Federation.”
later in the full report :
RT.com’s news coverage regularly advances false claims and propaganda promoted by the Kremlin,
and omits or refutes facts and positions that do not align with the Russian government, which owns and funds RT.
@SeaGreenEyez IMO, Assad, Putin, and Erdogan would 'like' those opinions
@SeaGreenEyez Your claim (or Putins) that those circumstances are facts does not make them so.
But such a questionable source.
Where have you been for the last 4 wars?..It's about Blood for Oil..
Statistically RT is a more reliable source than Donald Trump.
@SeaGreenEyez Suit yourself, if you don't mind getting info from Putin.