Grammer police Jurisdiction and psychology.

I do not think or speak in exact written structured form like highly technical writings.

Sometimes I contemplate the thoughts of people online that act like grammar police, even in what I would consider more so informal communications platforms, such as this writ.

Can a person become so mentally structured that they cannot comprehend even a vague ideal of an ideal in writting that is out of perfect grammatical structure? I would think not because all of my grade school English teachers could still understand what I was writing about even though my grammer was not good.

1. I do not try to hate on grammer police, but I can find them, could I say, non-conversational, in an informal textual context.

2. I have a minor genetic eye disease that gets worse with age, but it started causing me flustrations with words at a young age.

I can highly appreciation technical writings or well perfectly articulated writings in situtations where they should very much be policed by grammar police. I have education and work experience in legal studies and legal related field.

I have bad grammer days and worse grammer days in my times of informal online text chatting.

I hate to call grammar police stupid because i do understand the highly intellectual organization of thoughts required to have good grammer, but when "attacked" by such for my writings be "unintelligible" to them because of some grammatical errors and their inability to ask a simple question for clarification in conversation, it really makes me wonder if these grammer police are only smark in grammer and can only understand perfect gramner and way to stupid to understand general ideals being passed if the text is out of gramnatical format. Its like can someone become so technically smart that it makes them stupid?