I know the question was offensive. I was merely experimenting on social reaction. The percentages we're not what I had anticipated. 98 percent undecided was a shock but will in the end prove my point. My point is that the Venus project proposal is this, no currency, a resource based economy where the public votes on what resources go where. If people can't answer a simple question without being undecided because they are offended what will they do when asked to send resources to an ares of people that offended them. Like a gay, nude or athiest community. I no I'm not that smart, no brain surgeons at my family reunion, because the more knowledge I gain the more I know I don't know much at all. That's why I reach out to others to try to understand things I can't grasp. I was thinking to post a similar question on religious social sites, " Should we educate or exterminate Athiests?", to see if the percentages matched up.

So your saying if I worded the question different, sugar coat it like politicians do, my results would've been much different.

sadly, yes.