Agnostic.com

5 4

Enjoy being online again!

Welcome to the community of good people who base their values on evidence and appreciate civil discourse - the social network you will enjoy.

Create your free account

5 comments

Feel free to reply to any comment by clicking the "Reply" button.

1

,,,hell yeah- " incur increased out of pocket($) co pay";
y sure😔/give pay increases; pass some co pay to lobbies.
🤡

2

"Some military retirees and their families will also see increased out-of-pocket costs, the memo notes, since care received off-base by those users require copays.

"Some beneficiaries may see some increased out-of-pocket costs. Retirees and their families who receive care at MTFs generally do not incur out-of-pocket copays for that care. When these beneficiaries receive care from Tricare's civilian network, they will incur co-payments," it states.
So, now I may have to make copays to see a doctor. And if I can't afford that too? Along with the increased co pay for RX?

P
Yup so the 1% get more tax cuts

@bobwjr And for the corporate contractors to no doubt get bigger profits; a larger cut of the military appropriations.

3

WTF?? Promise from the Government is no good? Surprise!
Lets give another 1.2 trillion to the rich. The vets don't need anything.

5

Fuck! Way to treat folks who serve their country.

Yeah trump doesn't give a shit about vets

@bobwjr Cadet Bonespurs...

5

WTF? With the huge Defense spending bill they just got, they're going to limit care to active duty personnel only? I could maybe understand moving retirees to civilian facilities (not that I agree with that, I don't), but active duty families?! This will surely be a disincentive for joining up. It might even lead to service members getting out sooner rather than later.

P.S. I was born at a Naval hospital.

Spend nothing cut benefits Republican party

@bobwjr This really is essentially the opposite direction I would prefer to see things going. Given all the problems in the VA healthcare system, I think they should put active duty personnel in charge of and throughout the system. I think things would run much better that way, i.e. vets would be less likely to be jerked around.

@bingst then we need to vote these Assholes out vets were better served before

Write Comment
You can include a link to this post in your posts and comments by including the text q:458250
Agnostic does not evaluate or guarantee the accuracy of any content. Read full disclaimer.