I love this rare clip from Christopher Hitchens. It's amusing, raw and honest.
I think Christopher recognizes and respects the eternally unwavering Contrarian, being one himself.
I think that I can relate to Mr. Hitchens frustration. This is an interesting thought, so I want to reply. But it is taking me a while to figure out how. I do not think that I would do it either. But it is difficult to express why. Religion may be on it's way out. But I am sure that it is centuries away from being so. The frustration may lie in the absence of an explanation for the religious disappearance. Religion is truly important to millions. If it is just like, poof it's gone, we may be disregarding the strong feelings of billions. One just has to sense that there is something wrong with, poof it's gone.
There is a little bit of agnosticism in everyone. The angels test every baby as it is born.
I would not drive religion out of this world, because it would result in me being exceedingly bored: I would have nothing left with which to demean the cretins who rejoice in attacking me for merely being what I am.
Um, a curious statement indeed. Personally, I would not want that level of responsibility. Religious belief has caused massive destruction of many cultural beliefs and ways. On the other hand religious affiliation has provided much support via counseling, caring for the hungry, sick and homeless. Catholic schools provided a good education, if one could afford it.
The real issue is not religion so much as the twisted control many religious fanatics use against believers - priests that abuse, women's place in the world - the misogyny directed at 50% of the followers.
I've always loved Hitchens. If there was one of them I would want to sit and talk with most, it would be him. He had a certain charisma about him that even his opponents couldn't deny. His closing speech during his last debate is one of my favorites of all time.
Hitchens was an interesting cat, that's for sure.
I recall seeing that exchange (four horsemen conversation) and I was confused by what he said too.
Why did it confuse you ?
I kinda get what he was saying... Bad ideas still have some merit in society, even if it's purpose is just to show there can be an opposing point of view.
@oinkoink69
The concept wasn't confusing; that was clear.
He has said and written about how "religion poisons everything." If he believes that to be true, why would he want it to continue and watch lies be propagated and want more generations of oppression, discrimination, judgement and religious persecution?
The reason he has argued against religion is because of his opposition to all these things.
Get why I'm confused?