If I ask "Do god(s)s exist?" and your answer is:

"No", I label you an atheist.
"Yes", I label you a theist.
"Maybe", I label you an agnostic.
"I don't care", I level you an apatheistic.
"Question is ll-defined", I label you an ignostic.

Simple process with no reliance on belief vs. knowledge needed.
It is my opinion that belief vs. knowledge only label the surety of your position, not to the actual nature of it; a difference in degree, not kind.

If I then ask "Do thoughts of god influence your daily activities?" and your answer is:

"No", then I label you secular
"Yes", then I label you religious.

What this attempts to do is separate the ontic position (existence) from the epistic position (cognition) and allows for many combinations between the two... religious theist being one who says god(s) exist and acts on it... secular theist being one way says god(s) exist but doesn't act on it... secular atheist as one that says god(s) don't exist and doesn't act on it... etc.

What advantages or disadvantages do you see with this prescription?
Does it break in some obvious or not obvious sense or does it help put things in perspective?