Private gun ownership may be necessary on very limited occasions. It always seems to be a case of extremes and in the US today we definitely have an extreme. For some in a rural location it might be the case but for most in the urban setting it is not necessary.

As a British citizen, to be armed is an alien concept for me...but I do understand historically why Americans felt compelled to bear arms, as it was a matter of survival. In the 21st century though, I’d question the need for normal citizens to be armed, especially in urban areas.

It depends on where you live. If you live in Alaska how would you feel? If you live in downtown NY, probably not? That's why different laws are required for each state, county. But some laws are not disputable at the federal level. We had a cougar kill at the end of the block last month. Black bears are common here. And the coyotes are everywhere.
So, no protection for me? That's stupid. I have one shotgun, and I don't know what kind it is. Anymore than I can name the brands of tools in my garage.
But a 21 year old buying a AR 15? That's just loony. Or a 500 magnum? Up the age to thirty. The younger are not as mature as we were.
(If a law can limit age, it can also set a new age limit)

This is not even a topic of discussion in Canada. We view American gun ownership as a huge problem. The frequency and rate of your mass shootings and death statistics caused by guns speak for themselves.

More guns to solve this?

How about more cancer to beat cancer?

I’m with you, for all those reasons. I’m a moderate, active Democrat, too ~

I have no problem with private ownership of shot guns and hunting rifles. Hand guns should require a special license for special reasons like someone transporting large quantities of cash or gem stones, certain security jobs...We will get there one day.