You can live in the most beautiful place you've ever seen, but your house would be ... not so great and tiny. Do you think it is worth the trade-off?
My current apartment is less than 400 square feet and my 2 previous apartments too. It keeps me from accumulating too much stuff. It's low maintenance. I would like to have my own home, but they're way out of my price range. I used to own a 600 square foot condo. Plenty of room for me. Loved it. Should have kept it. There are still some older houses I've seen on Zillow in the $20-$30,000
I'm already living in a 400 sq ft apartment. Coming from a 3700 sq ft luxury estate home when I was married, it has been a shock. I'm still paring down. Unfortunately I don't have a scenic view though across the street is a deep-water canal leading out into Tampa Bay.
Well... I spend more time inside my home then outside. I would rather the home be nice and roomy and comfortable. The outside views are only an illusion for me. Matter a fact, its all an illusion when you take a good look at it. I have a motor home to see the sites. It's roomy but smaller then a house. I wouldn't want to live in it just to be parked outside a beautiful scenery.
Absolutely YES, I intend to live in a 30 sq. ft. space.... for at least a year..... maybe more if it seems like I’m not done with my travels yet, and I have been living in a 400 sq. ft. Studio for 5 years and it’s been great..... here is a pic of the house I built for traveling....