Agnostic.com

3 0

Wait a second... The New York Times said this???? 🤣 So back then it was an issue to the left wing liberal wrag,, but not now? That's just so damn typical.. [nytimes.com]

Captain_Feelgood 8 Aug 4
Share

Enjoy being online again!

Welcome to the community of good people who base their values on evidence and appreciate civil discourse - the social network you will enjoy.

Create your free account

3 comments

Feel free to reply to any comment by clicking the "Reply" button.

0

It's fake news.
We haven't heard the end of the misdirection ploys, by a long shot.
The Pubs will do ANYTHING to survive and prosper. It remains to be seen if our long-suffering Democratic heroes will prevail.

0

. . . article is (almost) EIGHT YEARS OLD. 😛

. . . and there was NO pandemic !
. . . and five states have done it for years.

3

The number ultimately rejected or fraudulent in a major election is still statistically not significant. The good thing with all the recent uproar, states are reviewing their mail-in policies and procedures. In doing so, many of the catchpoints will be addressed ahead of time, some will not.

The election is a very complex concept and multi-faceted procedure. There will always be problems, points of contention, and errors. In general, our elections are the most fair and even-handed in the world. If you really want address the concept of one person, one vote, take on the voter suppression laws in the South. That would really be a fight worth addressing. Not mail-in voting.

You can include a link to this post in your posts and comments by including the text q:521670
Agnostic does not evaluate or guarantee the accuracy of any content. Read full disclaimer.