This is a good thing.
Nice that they have other options than joining a cult for socialization.
They say it is because social media give them identity, rather than getting it from their religion. But another factor could be that social media broadens their horizons, rather like travel. One of the great props of religion especially in the US, I always thought, was that Americans were statistically the least traveled nation in the developed world. It is much easier to think that people from other cultures are going to hell, when you don't know any people beyond your own county boundary.
A thickening of the thin end of the wedge, perhaps, as it gets driven in. Europe has certainly reached a far fatter wedge sector.
Is it true that many European countries collect a tax for church goers?
@Lorajay Some countries do have a "church tax" or "worship tax" which is levied by the state on behalf of the religious group in which you are registered as a member. It is usually between 1 and 2 percent of one's income. However, it is a "voluntary" tax in that individuals can withdraw their membership of any or all groups.
The idea is to help churches to survive whilst retaining separation of church and state.
However, some nations also make an annual donation to the state's official church, which is really not on, as it means everyone, even atheists, are supporting a religion. I think Germany is one such nation.
Spain and Portugal used to do so, but that is no longer the case.
The UK most decidedly does not. You might find this interesting;-
[theguardian.com]
Yes, that is good. They are finding community and belonging outside of religious groups. Unfortunately, religious affiliation for African Americans and those who identify as politically conservative declined the least across the different generations.
A lot of community can be obtained from "Clappy Happy" church go-ing, which might explain why the decline is lower in some groups.