Agnostic.com

3 0

SCOTUS opposes its own expansion.

[washingtontimes.com]

PBuck0145 7 Apr 16
Share

Enjoy being online again!

Welcome to the community of good people who base their values on evidence and appreciate civil discourse - the social network you will enjoy.

Create your free account

3 comments

Feel free to reply to any comment by clicking the "Reply" button.

0

It's called slamming the door behind you.

0

Article more than four years old from a biased and questionable source. Ho hum.

[mediabiasfactcheck.com]

Thursday, April 15, 2021

@PBuck0145 I was looking at the wrong date. Hilarious article, though. All but one of the judges referenced are dead, some for decades, such that their comments were not made in the current context which is important because they opposed expanding the court for political reasons but SCOTUS is now more politicized than ever because of Trump's questionable appointments. Yet another bs article from you, nothing new here.

@Kbdank71 Try to keep up.

@Kbdank71 Dates don't require "figuring out", Einstein. I mistakenly glanced at the date on the line above. I acknowledged my error. You don't have to be an asshole about it. Way to completely miss the insignificance of the article!

@Kbdank71 If that were true, your comment would be above mine.

0
You can include a link to this post in your posts and comments by including the text q:589913
Agnostic does not evaluate or guarantee the accuracy of any content. Read full disclaimer.