This list does not mention the Ethiopian Coptic cannon, the Coptic cannon, the Jerusalem Bible, the Marcion Cannon or the Syriac. All of which are different again, depending on when and where they were compiled.
The history of the bible is a mess.
When people in the west talk about the "Holy Bible" they are talking almost invariably about the KJV an edited and retranslated Anglican version of the Vulgate Bible dating from 1611, or the Douay Rheims version the Vatican approved edit and translation of the Vulgate from 1582 which has been "revised" countless times, the last time being in 1941.
Most RC and CofE members are not aware of differences between their respective version and are completely unaware of all the other canons.
MY personal favourite is the pre 2013 The New World Translation of the Holy Scriptures used by the Jehovah's witless, which was translated by a committe of seven "scholars" only one of who spoke "modern" Greek, none of who spoke Latin, Aramaic, Hebrew or ancient Greek and is such a joke that in 2013, all copies were withdrawn and replaced with the revised edition, which is basically the KJV having been run through a find and replace program to change every mention of god, Elohim, Adonia and the tetrogram with Jehovah.

The early days of when the text was written, the people writing were the gods. Collectively, called "word of God".

The text left Israeli culture and some of the original, perhaps unwritten, verbal connitation understanding of what was meant got lost and the new language words gave some change to the understanding that wasn't original.

It's like the original word Ruach is force like breath. It got changed into ghost as in holy ghost.

Force of kinetic energy and ghost are basically different.

None of the above. Anyone who could read should discern that.

had a preacher try to tell me once that the King James version of the text was the only "scriptural" and "true" rendering of gods word. he was way gone crazy.

All stupid