So should the government dictate how people should practice their religion?

@Heavykevy1985 where do you draw the line? If my religion condones child marriages, wife beating, female circumcising, body mutilation, witch drowning, or any of a multitude of illegal activities, they should be protected from government interference? We already do this in many states, by removing Amish from education laws and extremely lax enforcements of child labor laws. So why not apply that to all religious beliefs, as long as they are not forcing non believers to do it?

@Barnie2years I knew that you were going to go this route. Religion is a personal matter with individuals and communities. Individuals participating in said community should opt without coercion. All those you mentioned are acts that are no consensual. Define “body mutilation.” A tattoo or piercing is a mutilation of the flesh. You may comfortable with the state dictating people’s personal beliefs, but where do you draw the line?

@Heavykevy1985 I'd draw the line whe religion causes harm to people, animals and property.

@Barnie2years again, you are speaking of things that are nonconsensual. Child labor was made illegal with lobbying primarily from unions because child labor undercut the price of adult workers. Again, child marriage is a nonconsensual custom. Children cannot enter into a legally-binding agreement. So again, what gives you the justification to curb religious freedom, which is enshrined in our constitution.

@Barnie2years find it interesting that a lot of progs think that children have the wherewithal to go on puberty blockers to transition. If that is the case, what is the difference to that body modification and getting a tattoo?