He's an apologist for the genocides of indigenous children. He tries to reframe the situation in such a way that people wouldn't have to feel bad or sorry. As an example he says the unmarked mass graves were just normal cemetaries and fails to mention that they were kept hidden and secret by the Catholic church which hid th eevidence of the deaths and told the families of the children that they just ran away.
From the article, the Conservative wrote: "...the certain fact that souls were saved by the missionaries, the enduring belief of Christians that the Gospel is true and must be spread, is paramount; everything else is secondary."
So spreading Christianity excuses mass murder. (yet again)
(Free speech may be about the competition of ideas, but when old ideas have been fully discredited, can't we be more active about suppressing them?)