This is a philosophy post. Please vote and comment reasons why you voted as you did.
You know, philosophy like constructive discussion.
Because i almost died from measles when I was five. I'm partially deaf on one ear and was left with a heart murmur. There was a vaccine available. Children get vaccines for Polio, Smallpox, Mumps, Measles, Rubella, Diptheria, Whooping Couch, Tetanus, Rotoviris, Chicken Pox (there's more). What's the big fucking deal?
When I don’t have expertise in a field, I have to rely on those who do. When those who do don’t all agree, I have to listen to their reasons and use my best judgement as to who is right, and that would include but not be limited to noticing how many are on each side. A 52 to 48 split would require a lot of study. Anything better than 95 to 5 does not. Anybody who thinks 95 per cent of the world’s doctors are lying conspirators probably hasn’t thought things through.
This.
@powder
I think it's fine for people to discuss it, as long as they stick to the best data currently known, and to the medical/scientific consensus. The ethical questions are easy enough after we find out what the science says. So I have two questions:
and
Thanks.
@powder
I don't feel compelled to go on every wild goose chase I'm invited to. It's your claim - you can defend it or not. I'm content, so far, to trust the system we have. It's not that systems can't be corrupted, but there needs to be credible evidence for me to become concerned, and I haven't seen it, and I do try to keep up with the news. One non-peer-reviewed study done on people who were sick from delta after being vaxxed only for alpha... doesn't tell me much.