I would suggest we stop fighting for women's rights as a health issue. States of Americans have said loud and clear that they do not give one little shit about anyone's health outside their own. Further, health is not a right cited in our constitution (for either gender). I would advise labeling this attack on women as a human rights issue. There are people who, because they're of an unpopular minority, might care about human rights while rejecting health as a concern so my advice is purely strategic.
Good luck with whatever you do, American Girls.

An excellent argument indeed!

These conservatives are inconsistent in the application of state powers and I find their inconsistency mind boggling. According to their logic, they would have the state figuratively reach into a woman’s uterus at the moment of conception. (I suppose the fallopian tubes as well since that’s where conception actually occurs.) That blastocyst is the state’s property, not the woman’s. Apparently she has no choice in the matter, according to their logic, and not even RU-486 is acceptable to their morality.

And yet in every other area of life these conservatives have determined that the state has no say in what people do with their bodies. Don’t make me or my school-aged children wear a mask, and whatever you do don’t coerce me to get a vaccination!

But no-o-o-o, I just found out that my neighbor has missed her period and her home pregnancy test was positive, and she is contemplating getting an abortion, so now I’m going to sue her and anyone who helps her… What the fuck!

Yup, that's the argument. It's the crux of the difference between abortion and the death penalty too when arguing against someone that says you're being inconsistent if you're pro-choice and anti-capital punishment. No one person has to care for that prisoner, but only one person can care for the fetus, so the force v consent issue isn't analogous.