Agnostic.com

6 10

Judge in the Kyle Rittenhouse murder trial used biblical "history" to explain the hearsay rule to the jury. IMHO, religion shouldn't be in a court house unless it is on trial. I've no problems with the judge explaining rules to a jury, but I am pretty sure he could have come up with a non religious example. The defense was objecting to a tape being brought into evidence.

Open SmartNews and read "It’s ‘Actually’ in ‘the Bible’: Kyle Rittenhouse’s Judge Explains Hearsay Rule to Jury by Talking About Trials of St. Paul the Apostle" here: [share.smartnews.com]
To read it on the web, tap here: [share.smartnews.com]

Beowulfsfriend 9 Nov 3
Share

Enjoy being online again!

Welcome to the community of good people who base their values on evidence and appreciate civil discourse - the social network you will enjoy.

Create your free account

6 comments

Feel free to reply to any comment by clicking the "Reply" button.

1

Agree 100%

BD66 Level 8 Nov 4, 2021
1

As much as I am disheartened by the judge's comments and his poor example of "hearsay", so many judges have ruled back and forth over religious aspects in court its all just a damn spectacle now. It isn't even surprising or unexpected now. I guess the phrase I can make that best describes this would be, bedamned the constitution and the separation of church and state. A secular nation is nolonger secular when justices are biased with the indoctrination of religion to which they draw their judgment from. Personally I would much prefer, that as a prerequisite for becoming a justice in any court here in the country, it be required that the potential justice(s) be subjected to a test of impartiality to determine from whence they draw their guidance. Or simply make it where only those who are Athiest/Agnostic are permitted to obtain such positions. I can guarantee that if that were the case, the state of things in this country would drastically change. Alas, I digress.

1

Must be in Wisconsin? They're a bit presumptive of CON privilege up there.

2

That judge is dangerously incompetent. What if all the jurors were devout followers of the Norse gods?

1

He should recuse himself. This was entirely unnecessary and indicates bias.

I see it as being worse than that. My comment above refers.

@anglophone My comment speaks to how the issue could be practically handled within our existing system.

Although perhaps it should, I doubt a biblical reference would meet any standard for judicial incompetence. After all, the competition is mighty stiff.

4

I absolutely agree with you. Unfortunately we live in a theocratic society.

Write Comment
You can include a link to this post in your posts and comments by including the text q:631954
Agnostic does not evaluate or guarantee the accuracy of any content. Read full disclaimer.