This addresses one of the problems I've had with the Fermi Paradox, maybe the best we'll be able to do is a fairly clunky fusion plant that requires tritium (and therefore lithium), I've thought we're closer to the limits of engineering than speculative interstellar pundits assume. Carbon nanotubes or filaments are probably close to the strongest material possible and superconducting magnets are probably close to generating the strongest confinement too. Even 1 or 2% of the speed of light may be the practical limit. My second issue is that endless growth is desirable, hopefully any species technologically that advanced will also see the futility of filling the universe with potentially self destructive experiments.[theness.com]
. . . IMO, nothing more than speculation posted on a blog -- not really deserving of Academic/Science.
Our government now admits to a sighting being a UFO. I agree that it was and that some cannot be explained. None of this means we are witnessing beings from another planet piloting a flying craft.
Mass delusion and instrument failure are well documented phenomena. Extraordinary claims require extraordinary evidence and so I'm inclined to assume prosaic explanations rather than metaphysical ones.
The author says with certainty that neither probes nor aliens are here. And yet the Pentagon's report from last June plainly infers aliens are here. The behavior of the military, CIA and FOIA documents show the same. Fermi's paradox and other debunking lore ignores the extensive record of sightings and visitations, in order to stay in the good graces with the granting agencies. The performance characteristics of the vehicles observed clearly demonstrate capabilities well in advance of humans employing known physics.