(Baasiclly this is an effort to prevent poor people from voting, as the poor are the least likley ot have a photo ID.)
Two years after the Missouri Supreme Court struck down a similar measure, the state's Republican-led lawmakers on Thursday passed a bill that would require residents to have photo identification to cast a ballot.
"We already have a good system, we just had to make sure it's always better, because Missourians want and deserve to know that their election system is trustworthy," said GOP state Rep. John Simmons, the legislation's sponsor.
The requirement, part of a larger elections bill, passed the House on a party-line 97-47 vote. It now goes to Republican Gov. Mike Parson.
Why many Missouri Republicans fear Eric Greitens could win the state's Senate primary
Elections
Why many Missouri Republicans fear Eric Greitens could win the state's Senate primary
Missouri was one of the first states that tried to enact strict voter ID requirements, but the effort was long tangled in legal challenges.
In the new measure, if a voter didn't have a photo ID with them, they could cast a provisional ballot, which would only be counted if they returned to the polling place with a required ID or if election officials verified their signature.
What’s wrong with that. A photo ID should be required to vote in any national election.
Once the photo ID laws pass, they reduce the number of places that issue such IDs, which poor people have a hard time getting because they can't get there or can't afford to pay for the ID. It is in essence a modern day poll tax. You have to be able to afford to ID and transportation to get you to on eof hte fewer locations where the IDs are issued.
Voter ID laws are purposefully designed to reduce the umber of people who vote.
Republicans have wanted to stop people from voting for a long time.
They do that, and then move photo ID places out of reach - pure voter suppression.