You thought you were providing great opportunities for us all to participate in debates and discussions on the topics you like. You sound condescending.
You publish your thoughts on-line because you think they are interesting for others to read. You sound narcissistic.
And when not many people are interested in your blogs, you get disappointed and don't understand why they are not interested in your blogs.
It all sounds navel-gazing (self-indulgent) to me.
You make me perceive you this way, and if I've got you all wrong, changing your approach, as a blogger at least, would be worth considering.

Ooo err.

Former stalwart republican
Ex John Birch Society member
Erstwhile devout christian congregation commander
Agnostic

and

Here is how I feel: When someone starts out with an insult, I'm not too keen making the effort to look into what else the person has to say.

I enjoy this particular site because I like THIS community and don't feel a desire to seek out an expanded audience, especially if it might involve conflict. I've got plenty of places to go for that.

My feeling is that if you have ideas to bounce off agnostics -- and you want to know what THIS community thinks about them - then post those ideas here for the feedback you are seeking. Don't ask us to go to the effort to seek out a totally separate website and berate us if we don't. Not everyone likes to be abused, criticized and insulted.

You asked why people haven't flocked to your website/blog, so that is my honest answer. Besides, I'm lazy... I rarely click links from this site to other sources

In the spirit of constructive feedback ( as opposed to trashing out ) the reason I haven’t visited your blog is twofold.

The first is superficial and emotional on my part. It’s just off-putting for someone to drop in and try to pull members away to another site, without having invested time in getting acquainted with this site first. It is just too reminiscent of what scammers do for less noble purposes.

The second is more substantive. I could overcome my personal prejudices about etiquette if your teasers showed some promise that when I arrive at your blog I would find something I haven’t encountered a thousand times elsewhere, considered thoroughly already, and dismissed as not particularly well-developed thought… but they just don’t.

I acknowledge that my impression could be wrong, but the way to change that impression is to spend more time engaging discussions here in a way that generates interest in your ideas, rather than repeatedly begging for our time and attention.

You asked, so…
Style and substance.
Both missing.

Best regards.