Agnostic.com

2 0

A 'highly effective' hoodwink: 3 years later, there remains no functional cure for a coronavirus
There is no functional vaccine for a coronavirus and there never has been one.
[dossier.substack.com]

BDair 8 July 26
Share

Enjoy being online again!

Welcome to the community of good people who base their values on evidence and appreciate civil discourse - the social network you will enjoy.

Create your free account

2 comments

Feel free to reply to any comment by clicking the "Reply" button.

1

Nice conspiracy theory. Vaccine wasn't the Cure just a way to make it less deadly but thanks for doing research

lerlo Level 8 July 28, 2022

A 'vaccine' is intended to stop infection with or transmission of a virus.
The experimental mRNA biologic devices never succeeded in that.
They just kept lowering the goal posts. They can't go any lower without a shovel at this point, since the vaccines have proven to have a negative efficacy over time. The headline above is not actually correct, as there are proven protocols for prophylaxis and treatment of Covid. They are just not mRNA based biologics, which have never been proven effective.

vaccine - NOUN
a substance used to stimulate the production of antibodies and provide immunity against one or several diseases, prepared from the causative agent of a disease, its products, or a synthetic substitute, treated to act as an antigen without inducing the disease:

@BDair as is common these days you can find any definition online to match whatever you want it to say. Pretty sure there's no definition that says cure anywhere.
CDC:
a suspension of attenuated or killed microorganisms (viruses, bacteria, or rickettsiae), administered for prevention, amelioration, or treatment of infectious diseases.

Merriam Webster:

1: a preparation that is administered (as by injection) to stimulate the body's immune response against a specific infectious agent or disease: such as

Freedictionary:
a suspension of attenuated or killed microorganisms (viruses, bacteria, or rickettsiae), administered for prevention, amelioration, or treatment of infectious diseases.

The mRNA biologic devices for Covid do not meet any of those definitions.
They had to change their definition to fit their product.

@BDair they didn't change the free dictionary definition

The Freedictionary definition is not applicable to the the mRNA Covid vaccines which are based on a computer code and not an attenuated microorganism.

@BDair show me any place where it says it will cure a disease

Vaccines are never curative. They are supposed to be preventative. The mRNA injections are not.

@BDair hey it was your post that expected it to be a cure:
"A 'highly effective' hoodwink: 3 years later, there remains no functional cure for a coronavirus"

0

The critical test of any theory is whether it can be used to make accurate predictions. If all of this is true, and if you are adequately familiar with the field, you should be able to make some predictions that come true.

What quantifiable outcome can you predict from all of this information?

Will the FDA revoke the authorizations they have given? Will they choose instead to deny the validity of increasing data that conflict with their ruling? How will it resolve?

skado Level 9 July 26, 2022

The FDA has been captured by Pfizer and Big Pharma. They have ignored all of their own protocols in approving a medical product that never concluded its trials for safety and efficacy. They rubber stamped a EUA with incomplete and fraudulent data while they ignored clear safety signals.
You can read up on this case. [spaceworms.substack.com]

@BDair
So if this is true, what does it spell for the future that we could use as a test of its predictability? If it has no implications for the future, why should we care?

@BDair
Which protocols? Could you be specific? Where can I read these protocols? Thanks.

@BDair
“Spaceworms” - a googly-eyed cartoon character, who doesn’t reveal his credentials, or even his name… is a credible source ?

You can include a link to this post in your posts and comments by including the text q:678546
Agnostic does not evaluate or guarantee the accuracy of any content. Read full disclaimer.