Agnostic.com

1 1

LINK Creator of Kamala Harris parody video sues California over election ‘deepfake’ ban -- Politico

The complaint argues laws signed by Gov. Gavin Newsom violate free speech rights.

By Lara Korte

09/18/2024 10:00 PM EDT

SACRAMENTO, California — The creator of a video that used artificial intelligence to imitate Kamala Harris is suing the state of California after Gov. Gavin Newsom signed laws restricting the use of digitally altered political “deepfakes,” alleging First and 14th Amendment violations.

Christopher Kohls, who goes by the name “Mr Reagan” on X, has been at the center of a debate over the use of AI-generated material in elections since he posted the video in July, calling it a parody of a Harris campaign ad. It features AI-generated clips mimicking Harris’ voice and saying she’s the “ultimate diversity hire.” The video was shared by X owner Elon Musk without calling it parody and attracted the ire of Newsom, who vowed to ban such content.

The governor made good on that promise Tuesday by signing laws targeting fraudulent campaign materials. Now, Kohls is suing, arguing the governor is trying to make computer-generated parody illegal and asserting that political satire is a “fundamental First Amendment Right.”

The suit, filed Tuesday in federal court, seeks permanent injunctions against the laws.

One of the laws in question, the Defending Democracy from Deepfake Deception Act, specifies that it does not apply to satire or parody content. It requires large online platforms to remove or label deceptive, digitally altered media during certain periods before or after an election.

Newsom spokesperson Izzy Gardon said in a statement that Kohls had already labeled the post as a parody on X.

“Requiring them to use the word ‘parody’ on the actual video avoids further misleading the public as the video is shared across the platform,” Gardon said. “It’s unclear why this conservative activist is suing California. This new disclosure law for election misinformation isn’t any more onerous than laws already passed in other states, including Alabama.”

snytiger6 9 Sep 19
Share

Enjoy being online again!

Welcome to the community of good people who base their values on evidence and appreciate civil discourse - the social network you will enjoy.

Create your free account

1 comment

Feel free to reply to any comment by clicking the "Reply" button.

1

It seems to me that a law meant to prevent defamation and libel lawsuits, would not infringe on "free speech" as those acts are already illegal and actionable.

Court cases have been won where the courts determined that Person(s) have the rights to their own likeness and image, and misuse of that likeness or image is actionable. The state has an interest in preventing such misuse as it would help prevent the clogging of the court calendars.

As California is the entertainment capital of the world, and the reputation(s) of celebrities can be easily damaged if their image or likeness is stolen for purposes of misuse, the regulation of deep fakes will also protects the state's tax base generated by the entertainment industry.

You can include a link to this post in your posts and comments by including the text q:767474
Agnostic does not evaluate or guarantee the accuracy of any content. Read full disclaimer.