What does 'higher power' even mean? Compared to a glacier I don't have much impact.

I don't understand what you mean. An agnostic what? What is a higher power?

Are you an agnostic atheist or an agnostic theist?

The word deny makes it sound like there has ever been a cogent argument for a higher power.

God? life after death? reincarnation? higher being?
I seriously doubt it, but I don't know = my being agnostic

Along with the vast majority of things that I don't know about, there is this little niggle that goes on with quantum physics. This science is so far a field from anything I know, understand, or even conceive. And yet if I believe science (I do) then there I things that do exist that I do not understand. This can be true of almost anything that is beyond finite five senses. I believe there are things that are real and yet I don't understand. This being said, I have to go on what I can understand. Hence God? I don't know, but I doubt it seriously.

I tend to believe that the "higher power" is that which is in me. I can choose to follow either a positive poser or a negative one. I do not act in order to please any "higher power". I am responsible for my actions.

Hard to say... If by higher power you mean "creative energy", then I might lean towards an inclination to believe in such a thing. I don't think things like the formation of DNA is <i>just</i> random. But neither do I believe it to be the result of any kind of entity waving a magic wand.

I used a group for my higher power. That lasted 2 months. Then I stayed away from higher power questions in that group.

It really depends upon your definition of a higher power. If we’re talking about demigods or gods, I’d say no. If we’re talking about advanced aliens, I’d say yes. Of course, I do, actually, believe in higher degree polynomial functions.

The ONLY reason I call myself agnostic is because i hold to my non-belief the same way I hold to my understanding of science.

For example, it was once believed that if a body were in space without a space suit, one would explode. In truth, your body would inflate slightly, but you wouldn't explode. You'd die from lack of oxygen, but that's about it.

To be agnostic is to remain at least scientifically open enough to accept tangible evidence of an afterlife, a great creator, and all that stuff. But the evidence has to be pretty fucking tangible.

Neutral....it does not matter to me one way or another....I like to think that me and my actions and behavior is what matters on the day to day thing called living.

I don't necessarily believe in anything, only that a God could exist. I believe in the possibility of God, not the fact of God.
We know that Dark Matter exists but what Dark Matter is we don't know. Therefore, I could argue that Dark Matter is chocolate pudding and since there is no evidence at all, that argument would be valid. I have no knowledge of the true nature of Dark Matter, so everything about it is a belief.
People forget there is a difference between knowledge and belief.

I believe what I see and not what I presume or imagine

I'm probably closer to being atheist than agnostic. I'm not intelligent enough to say with any degree of certainty that there is no such thing as a God. If God were to exist I don't think he gives a damn what we do with our lives. Religion is a construct by self appointed authorities to control people and to be successful it relies on our innate fear of the unknown.

I am agnostic only as I can not to claim that I know what I do not know. If God by definition can not be perceived by man, I can not claim to know he does not exist. This being said I am certain with all knowledge and experience that I have that God does not exist, thus it is more proper to call me an atheist. I do not wonder if there might be a magic unicorn living in my butt, I am an magic butt unicorn atheist. If by definition I can not know the magic unicorn is living in my butt then I am a magic butt unicorn agnostic. The problem here is there are two distinctive meanings of agnostic we are dealing with here.

I have been given no reason to believe in a higher power, so I have no reason to believe in one. Sure, no one can prove that one doesn't exist, but right now, the evidence points to the idea that the universe works just fine without one.

I have recently discovered that the higher power is my conscientious, listening to the voice inside that gives me the ability to make positive changes within and for myself. Sometimes finding those eureka moments in unlikely places makes it interesting but still very valid.

To be honest, I'm more inclined to "believe" in a "higher power" than deny it. That doesn't mean I'm talking about "God," but only that there is a part of me that has access to the resources I currently don't understand. There is a potential that exists within me that "transcends" me, which probably comes from the me that really knows me.

I'd have to say that I'm pretty neutral. I'd be willing to accept any evidence of a higher power but, so far, I've seen none.

I can neither believe or deny something that does not exist, both are an exercise in futility.