More important to me that people understand the way that I think as opposed to being defined by labels which can be interpreted in different ways. I say the following
I don't say that the super natural (including ) definitely does not exist, instead, I say that any evidence that I have been presented with to say that the super natural (and/or ) exists, has not stood up to any scrutiny whatsoever.
If you think this makes me agnostic then fine, but I am equally agnostic about the tooth fairy and the flying spaghetti monster
0
Enjoy being online again!
Welcome to the community of good people who base their values on evidence and appreciate civil discourse - the social network you will enjoy.Create your free account
Recent Visitors 10
Photos
Posted by AlmostVulcanA/Gnostic A/Theist. (Apologies if re-post)
Posted by UUNJA bit of humor.