More important to me that people understand the way that I think as opposed to being defined by labels which can be interpreted in different ways. I say the following
I don't say that the super natural (including ) definitely does not exist, instead, I say that any evidence that I have been presented with to say that the super natural (and/or ) exists, has not stood up to any scrutiny whatsoever.
If you think this makes me agnostic then fine, but I am equally agnostic about the tooth fairy and the flying spaghetti monster
0
Enjoy being online again!
Welcome to the community of good people who base their values on evidence and appreciate civil discourse - the social network you will enjoy.Create your free account
1 comment
Feel free to reply to any comment by clicking the "Reply" button.And all Gods too, everyone of the thousands believed in by people, not just God singular and the Christian God in particular. This is an important point for any agnostic to acknowledge. I like your position on the evidence issue and agree totally. But for consistency it does have to apply equally and fully to all gods, ancient and modern, as well as the tooth fairy etc, and not, as Bertrand Russell wrote, just be an implied atheism on all Gods that one may not care about, but agnostic on the one God we do know and grew up with.
David1955
Level 8
May 31, 2018
0
Recent Visitors 10
Photos
Posted by AlmostVulcanA/Gnostic A/Theist. (Apologies if re-post)
Posted by UUNJA bit of humor.