You’ll be waiting a long time!

I think I misread what you meant...!

@Marionville I think you got it, I was just playing along.

As a whole, over the time period beginning from when Trump began campaigning, WSWS and the SEP have provided a series of articles that have virtually, correctly, outlined what we are seeing today from actions, statements, and the personas of people and groups from the past that Trump and or those people have ties to within those groups. For example, if you think Mercer, Bannon, or Stone just went on their merry way and left their agenda for Trump to continue on his own, you'd be mistaken. They've been working behind the scenes with the type at the Capital which have been given good reason to be concerned by a few of these past articles with some details. You have to follow the source to recognize the correlation! Along with the few others I use who often correlate with each other.

One of my agendas in this group is to provide what I consider better news sources for people to follow and compare to MSCM fake news. If you don't use these sources on a regular bases in effort to discover their full potential you're going to continue to miss the correlations I find in the accuracy they provide. As you have been coming here for a while now, you continually challenge me rather than do the work for yourself. It's quite presumptuous of you to attempt to force me into spending my time combatting with you for what ever reason you feel this is self justified while you ignore the narrative of the group. If your agenda here is to combat me and my sources of information then you're simply an obstacle of my purposes, wasting my time, and possibly attempting to suppress my efforts, and wish to deter other members who have a genuine desire towards a new journey as they are awakening from fake news and their new discovery of fake capitalism and the horrific effects of empire building.

Claim? There can be a number of claims found in the article. All you offer me is a can of worms to address. Did you read the article to even understand this? If you're questioning the pasted paragraph from the article I use to draw attention to the article, then your confusion is related to the above. Because you're agenda apparently is more driven to challenge me you have managed to miss the message in the article, more importantly, past articles which would provide the reasoning that statement was made. Proving to me you have no genuine desire here other than to be a negative aspect against the groups narratives. You have no desire to become a productive member or visitor here. If you did, you would have provided your own opinion on what ever the fuck it is you're talking about with your own fucking informative source that would give us here a reason to consider you being here as a good faith.

@LenHazell53 thank you. I rest my case.