Agnostic.com

10 1

Would Clinton really have been better? [democracynow.org]

Krish55 8 June 16
Share

Enjoy being online again!

Welcome to the community of good people who base their values on evidence and appreciate civil discourse - the social network you will enjoy.

Create your free account

10 comments

Feel free to reply to any comment by clicking the "Reply" button.

0

Absolutely, we'd be better off with an empty office over what we've got now

1

Clinton in the campaign was more militarily hawkish then Trump. She helped to destroy Libya and Syria.

1

I think that Hillary Clinton as President would have been similar to what things were like under Bill Clinton. We got along well with our friends. reduced the federal deficit, and had a very long period of economic growth.

2

Perhaps she would not deny climate change.

EdEarl Level 8 June 17, 2018
2

Would not having cancer be better than having it? What a ridiculous question.

2

No. The US would be in a war with North Korea and Iran by now

0
2

Slightly less bad. I voted for Gary Johnson. As far as I'm concerned, Trump and Clinton should be cell mates in prison.

1

She would have been LESS BAD.

That's a whole, long way from 'good' - but still an improvement on Trump.

Honestly - almost anyone would be better than the Trump/Pence combination.

2

Can't believe we're still asking this question.

Would she be maintaining income inequality? Probably.

Would she be praising white supremecists for winning elections, pardoning assholes like Joe Arpaio, taking people's kids away and putting them in camps, slapping tariffs on imports from our allies, and flat-out denying climate change? Probably not

Write Comment
You can include a link to this post in your posts and comments by including the text q:108889
Agnostic does not evaluate or guarantee the accuracy of any content. Read full disclaimer.