Agnostic.com

4 5

"31 Questions for Atheists

There is a list of questions for atheists at CARM ; I saw them on Godless Mom and thought I’d write up my responses.

  1. How would you define atheism?

I would use the dictionary, which says “disbelief in, or denial of, the existence of God”. So the term includes both strong atheists who assert that there is no God, and weak atheists who just don’t believe in any god, but do not make the positive assertion that none exists. For myself, I am a weak atheist on gods in general, since there’s no way to prove they don’t exist, but no reason to believe they do, either. On the Abrahamic God, I am happy to assert that he does not exist as described, based on his inherent contradictions and the obvious mythical nature of the Bible.

  1. Do you act according to what you believe (there is no God) in or what you don’t believe in (lack belief in God)?

I find the question to be nonsensical. In general, I would say I act based on what I believe, but I don’t act according to the idea that there is no god. I don’t know how to do that.

  1. Do you think it is inconsistent for someone who “lacks belief” in God to work against God’s existence by attempting to show that God doesn’t exist?

It is clearly not inconsistent. Whether any gods exist or not, it’s a fact that real people believe in them. If gods do not exist, and real people believe they do, and act on it, why would it be inconsistent to tell them?

  1. How sure are you that your atheism properly represents reality?

This is an oddly worded question. I am 100% sure that atheism represents reality, because even if a god exists, the universe behaves as if one doesn’t.

  1. How sure are you that your atheism is correct?

The question is basically the same as above; I will assume it means “how sure are you that there is no God?” I am as sure as I am of anything that the God of the Bible does not exist as described. Anyone who has critically read the whole Bible can see that. I cannot really assess the probability that a deist, non-interventionist god exists. It doesn’t seem likely, but if I found out that one did, it would not change how I live my life in any meaningful way.

  1. How would you define what truth is?

The dictionary says “conformity with reality” and that aligns with how I use the word. Most people, theist and atheist, agree that some claims (ones that aren’t opinion) have truth value. The statement “God exists as described in the Bible” is either true or false, whether or not we are capable of determining the truth of it. People who reject all truth with relativism like “It’s true for me” aren’t capable of rational discussion.

  1. Why do you believe your atheism is a justifiable position to hold?

Atheism is justified because there is no good evidence of any gods. Disbelief in anything that has no evidence for its existence is a logical default. If it’s good enough for leprechauns and fairies, it’s good enough for gods.

  1. Are you a materialist or a physicalist or what?

I suppose I am a provisional materialist. I do not see any reason to think anything totally detached from the physical exists, but I am open to it, if it can be shown to exist.

  1. Do you affirm or deny that atheism is a worldview? Why or why not?

I don’t see how atheism could be considered a worldview in and of itself. I don’t think it would make much sense to answer the question “How do you view the world?” with “I don’t believe in any gods.” It is one word that you could use to describe a worldview, so I don’t object to the phrase “atheistic worldview” per se, though it’s usually followed by a straw man.

  1. Not all atheists are antagonistic to Christianity but for those of you who are, why the antagonism?

I object to many features of many religions, not just Christianity. Many Christians use their beliefs to treat homosexuals as second class citizens, to get privilege for their own beliefs, try to teach religion in science classes, etc.

[discountbutcher.wordpress.com]

sundug 5 June 17
Share

Enjoy being online again!

Welcome to the community of good people who base their values on evidence and appreciate civil discourse - the social network you will enjoy.

Create your free account

4 comments

Feel free to reply to any comment by clicking the "Reply" button.

1

Q1 I don't believe in Ra, Thor or any of the other 10,000 gods. How do you define your non belief in Zeus?
Q2 I act like I don't believe in Santa, The Tooth Faerie or the Easter Bunny. What was the question again?
Q3 Yes, I do believe it is inconsistent. So I don't "work against god" I work "against superstition and ignorance". I can't work against a illusion.
Q4 Just because I don't believe in your god don't mean I "work against god". I just work for things that can be shown to actually exist. I also don't "work against" Unicorns, flying horses and faeries at the bottom of the garden.
Q5 I'm not. Well not sure enough to burn someone at the stake because they think I am wrong. But since you don't believe in Thor or Ra you can relate because I just believe in one less god than you.
Q6 See Question 5 . Apply your reasoning to for being a Thor atheist and a Ra atheist to your dogma.
Q7 Truth is consistent. It doesn't have 4,200 different "Versions" and 14,000 thousand contradictions. (I'm talking about the number of christ cults and the "holy truth" of christian dogma.
Q8 I don't have a set position. It constiently changes with new information. I did once believe the same as you. Then I stood in front of a library and decided that either one book was right and all the books in the library were wrong or perhaps just one book was wrong. So I read a few more books so. my position changes.
Q9 By materialistic do you mean I lie to people and threaten children with burning in Hell to gain wealth? As for materialist . Yes, I do like things I don't need but there are things I can do without like gold. Or a funny hat.
Q10 Is it a "world view"? There are "un-believers" world wide I suppose but then the "world view" is there are more that 10,000 gods. To them you are a non-beleiver.
Are there really 31 questions? I will jump to
Q12 Yes! Yes and yes. A world with out religion would be a better place. Just imagine if all the money given to just your cult in the past 1,000 years was spent on medicine and/or science or clean water or a thousand other things. The only things the christian religion has done for us is to rid us of witches. If your lot didn't burn them all we would be over run by now and have curses put on us. And I suppose your religion has reduced the population over the past 2000 years as well by fighting between the various cults and/or anyone that didn't accept your loving god.

I would answer more but it won't help because people believe what the need to believe, None of the answers will address the need to believe. Stupid people ask stupid questions.

1

1.godless
2. I don't 'believe' there is no god - I neithere have nor want one.
3. not bothered enough to answer this one .
4. ridiculous question.
5. ditto
6. I wouldnt even try. I would try to speak truthfully for myself is all.
7. I don't it just is my position I don't need to defend my postiion.
8. I am a woman
9. neither the subject has no interest for me . I don't need to explore my lack of belief I ma very happy being godless.
10. not antagonistic couldn't care less- different strokes for different folks.
11

jacpod Level 8 June 18, 2018
1

The questions are designed to gum around the edges and look for weakness or uncertainty.

#9 is interesting; it suggests a real obstinacy about atheism being a "worldview" when it's no more a worldview than not collecting stamps or being bald. Nor is there a central body that decides what we believe or teach. We don't need one; we simply follow evidence where it leads. The effort here is to establish that you follow a competing philosophy and this sets them up to "prove" that it's "wrong". When the real issues is they haven't demonstrated that their belief-system is supportable.

@Matias The difference is that philately has not, historically, been a dominant force in society that has imposed its will and hegemony and demonized dissenters for generations. Aphilately, to coin a word, isn't a necessary or useful concept as a result. And as religion slides toward irrelevance in the generations to come, there will come a point where atheism will no longer be a useful concept either, and we won't have to debate the matter. I look forward to that day.

@Matias Then you'd be mistaken. I have always said I have a lot of common cause with liberal theists, and that the way out of religion is through it -- to domesticate and detoxify, as you put it. Liberal Christianity (for example) represents that gentling and dilution and fundamentalists know that it does. That sort of religion looks increasingly like secular humanism, until that's just what it, in fact, becomes.

1

This question is crap, and I see/hear it all the time:
"Not all atheists are antagonistic to Christianity but for those of you who are, why the antagonism?"

If you say anything that challenges the status quo of religion in political, or even civil activities, you're considered antagonistic. The question should be restated to meet the actual intent "Why can't you just be a silent atheist?"

Marz Level 7 June 17, 2018
Write Comment
You can include a link to this post in your posts and comments by including the text q:109413
Agnostic does not evaluate or guarantee the accuracy of any content. Read full disclaimer.